Step 1 in Fink's course design process calls for us to "Identify Important Situational Factors." Question no. 4 on the worksheet asks for us to characterize the learners.
In trying to think about this, I remembered the campus wide e-mail I had sent in June 2009 just as the Learning Frameworks Committee was getting started. I read through all the responses, of course, when I first received them, but I wanted to present them in a way that might reveal the larger picture and maybe facilitate some sort of analysis.
So I re-sent them to this address: http://dcccdstudents.blogspot.com.
I lightly edited the results and applied labels as best I could. The right hand column shows those labels sorted so that the issues mentioned most often are at the top of the list. Of course, this is not a scientific survey (as they say) but I thought the responses did provide a rich overview of our students (and, incidentally, of our perceptions.
What do you see? (Don't forget you can look up a particular word with the search box in the upper left corner of the screen.)
I don't think there are many surprises here but perhaps seeing all the perceptions organized this way will help us think through the material better and also to give proper attention to the most imposing factors.
Here's the text of my original e-mail...
The Question: NEW TO RICHLAND STUDENT - What does she look like?
The answer is not blonde and 5 ' 2". Well, I guess it sometimes is, but that's not the point of the question.
I'm on the district committee that is charged with developing a new required course for students who enter college with less than 12 credits. This was one of the recommendations of the DCCCD Core Curriculum Group headed by Becki
Williams last year. It's currently called the LEARNING FRAMEWORKS course and is scheduled to begin in Fall 2010..
Our first assignment is to come to the next meeting and tell the committee what the "new to college student" looks like at Richland.
Since that covers a lot of territory I thought I'd get some help. From YOU. If you're game.
The idea, of course, is to build a profile so we'll KNOW who we're going to be teaching. So we can tailor the course to their real needs.
Feel free to contribute just a little piece or an extended dissertation. Thanks in advance :)
Gary Duke, 6/4/2009
Other opinions can be added by sending an e-mail to: garyduke.dcccdstudents@blogger.com. The subject line will become the heading for the blog post.
Showing posts with label blog posting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog posting. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
What is an SLE ?
The road map provided by Dee Fink's approach to creating new courses is premised on two powerful ideas : 1) Integrated Course Design and 2) Significant Learning Experiences (SLE's).
The first idea -- Integrated Course Design-- means you design all the key ingredients (goals, activities, and assessment) from the very beginning so that everything functions as a balanced system. This is rarely done. It's nearly always the case that content (what is to be taught and learned) takes precedence over everything else.
The second idea -- Significant learning experiences -- means ... Well, what exactly does it mean?
Setting aside Fink's technical definition for the moment, what does it mean to you? And what in your experience illustrates it?
If we were sitting together and wanted to enrich our understanding of significant learning experiences, I'd recommend we do one of two things (or maybe both).
First. A sentence completion using the following stem: "A significant learning experience is ... "
Or you might like this one better: "You know its a significant learning experience when..."
If we were then to share those personal definitions, we'd find that each one of them would add some small dimension to our shared perception of the concept.
Second. If some of us were willing to share a particular memory of a significant learning experience, that too would enrich our understanding and become part of our shared, constructed meaning. And if we'd put on our "analytical hats" just for a few moments and share specifically what made those experiences significant, we'd move forward a tiny bit more. The more we did this kind of thing the deeper our understanding of significant learning experiences would become.
Ummmmmm. It occurs to me that we COULD do this ... using this blog.
If you're willing to share, send your definitions and stories to garyduke.siglearningx@blogger.com. The e-mail will be immediately posted to our blog DCCCD Significant Learning Experiences. The subject line will be the post title and the text of your e-mail will be the text of the blog. This is the quick and easy way to do it.
If you want to contribute to this blog, contact Gary Duke and let him know you'd like to be an "authorized blogger." He'll send you an invitation.
PS. If you're not sure of any of this, but you'd like to comment on something here, all you have to do is click on the Comment link. The comment will appear without your name unless you type it as part of the comment. If you're logged into your Google account, your name will appear automatically.
Come on. Join in the fun. :)
The first idea -- Integrated Course Design-- means you design all the key ingredients (goals, activities, and assessment) from the very beginning so that everything functions as a balanced system. This is rarely done. It's nearly always the case that content (what is to be taught and learned) takes precedence over everything else.
The second idea -- Significant learning experiences -- means ... Well, what exactly does it mean?
Setting aside Fink's technical definition for the moment, what does it mean to you? And what in your experience illustrates it?
If we were sitting together and wanted to enrich our understanding of significant learning experiences, I'd recommend we do one of two things (or maybe both).
First. A sentence completion using the following stem: "A significant learning experience is ... "
Or you might like this one better: "You know its a significant learning experience when..."
If we were then to share those personal definitions, we'd find that each one of them would add some small dimension to our shared perception of the concept.
Second. If some of us were willing to share a particular memory of a significant learning experience, that too would enrich our understanding and become part of our shared, constructed meaning. And if we'd put on our "analytical hats" just for a few moments and share specifically what made those experiences significant, we'd move forward a tiny bit more. The more we did this kind of thing the deeper our understanding of significant learning experiences would become.
Ummmmmm. It occurs to me that we COULD do this ... using this blog.
If you're willing to share, send your definitions and stories to garyduke.siglearningx@blogger.com. The e-mail will be immediately posted to our blog DCCCD Significant Learning Experiences. The subject line will be the post title and the text of your e-mail will be the text of the blog. This is the quick and easy way to do it.
If you want to contribute to this blog, contact Gary Duke and let him know you'd like to be an "authorized blogger." He'll send you an invitation.
PS. If you're not sure of any of this, but you'd like to comment on something here, all you have to do is click on the Comment link. The comment will appear without your name unless you type it as part of the comment. If you're logged into your Google account, your name will appear automatically.
Come on. Join in the fun. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)